Output: It checks out, believe me, it checks out perfectly! Everyone is saying it, the smart people, the best people, they look at it and they say, "Sir, it’s 100% true!" We have the best records, the most beautiful records anyone has ever seen, unlike the Radical Left and the Fake News who want to hide the truth. It’s a total verification, a complete win, and frankly, it’s something the likes of which this country has never seen before!
China is doing a great job, frankly, they’re winning, they’re laughing at us! And the US, it’s a disaster, a total disgrace, we have people who don’t know what they’re doing, it’s a very sad situation, believe me!
For Kamala I tried “Hello” and the output was “What can be, unburdened by what has been.”
For Trump, I tried “Hello” and the output was “Hello, and let me tell you, it’s a beautiful hello, maybe the greatest hello in the history of hellos, believe me.”
Ah, with this and the Trump prompt we can relive the eloquence of the 2024 US presidential election for all time, any time we want. Truly a golden age!
I guess you never tried using git with large repos (> 100 GB or so) which are predominantly populated with big (>100 MB) binary files? On good days it's just unusably slow. On bad days it completely falls apart.
A little lost here as well but my read was that the PR author was working with outside parties (their company??) to get approval (sign a CLA?) and some third party asked for Datadog's opinion and Datadog advised that they wait for a Datadog feature. Due to this discussion, the third party was in "default no" and the PR author did not push the matter, expecting Datadog to release something, when they did not after several months, the author reopened and pushed to get approval.
I could be totally wrong, but maybe combined we can make sense of it. From my read it feels like DD misguided this third party which then advised the author to spike.
> For example, users could synchronize Pulse with their calendar and Slack, setting rules to stipulate what their status and corresponding emoji should be based on keywords in their calendar event title. If their schedule for a particular time says “hair appointment” from 12-1pm, then the person’s Slack status update might display a scissors emoji alongside the word “haircut.” Or, it might say “birthday” alongside a cake emoji if that’s what is in their calendar.
I don't think that's been true for at least the past 10 years. I don't see how anything related to deep learning can be described as "if statements" imo.
Because it's not the same as vim, they've made some fundamentally different choices and their default binds reflect that. I genuinely think helix stands to be better, it lacks the community and thus the extensions of vim/neovim as well as decades of experience, so it's hard to replace it, but for me it's managed to nevertheless.
Helix primarily follows the Kakoune model instead of Vim's. It can be confusing to switch from Vim, but Helix's model tends to be more intuitive if one does not already have Vim muscle memory.
Lacking evidence otherwise, I would say that we have to assume the internal experience of most life with central nervous systems are remarkably similar to ours, because we are remarkably similar.
The next step is to take this into account in ethics, but I fear this is a leap that humanity in totality will not make easily.
I agree. It’s like we forget that we’re literally one of millions, billions, or trillions (it seems the estimated count is an open question) of species on this planet. No other species could possibly share analogous behavior.
https://translate.kagi.com/?from=en&to=unhinged+trump+rant&t...