Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sho_nuff's commentslogin

> * iPod -> Music player w/ FLAC + 1TB SD

Out of curiosity, which Music player did you settle on? I am in the market for one and looking for options (currently leaning towards a FiiO M11).


Currently a FiiO M3K and I've been super happy with it. Might be discontinued now, however.

The thought process for the purchase was that I wanted a standalone DAP without a touchscreen (iPod-esque), without wireless connectivity, with expandable storage, and not running Android. The M3K also has good Rockbox support including dual-boot, so I swap between that and the native Linux firmware at times.

I am considering getting a second device of some kind with Bluetooth because there are occasional but persistent times where it honestly would be nice. Ideally it'd still be running a pretty basic OS, though.


Thank you for pointing out that device.

I believe you are correct. I was only able to find a listing on Amazon for a used one of the M3K devices. Also found a listing on ebay.

I need a device with Bluetooth as my car doesn't have an auxiliary jack. Suppose that I could also make use of an low power FM transmitter also.


What type of screen did you settle on for your smartwatch?


Waveshare eink. They had the power supply schematics and driver source code on their homepage, which seemed convenient.


What are you using to host the server? VPS? Machine from your home network?


vps(https://contabo.com/) about $5 a month or so. I think Funkwhale can be hosted on a server with the library on amazon s3 if you want a lot of cheap storage. but ive been fine on my vps for now.


Have you considered the Bangle.js from Espruino (https://www.espruino.com/Bangle.js)?


yes, I have pre-ordered one in fact. I hope it will be of enough quality for my research!


I did encounter another but as I understand it, it is intended for developers only [1].

[1] https://www.pine64.org/pinetime/


Does it ship internationally?


Alas, I am not sure about that.


I got a reply from the maker that it does. So that's that.


I am interested in learning this style but keep getting drawn into some frameworks. What order would you recommend learning to create sites in this style?


If you're just building a website — i.e., not a highly interactive web application — here's what I'd recommend. I've been building websites since 1998, FWIW, although I'm now a stupid product manager, so take this with a grain of salt.

1. Write semantic HTML in a sane, human-centric order. Do not write any CSS yet.

2. Open your new web page in a browser. Imagine CSS doesn’t exist and you’re stuck with whatever the browser gives you forever (shudder). Is your site well-organized? Is it easy to read, to navigate? Are the most important elements on your page afforded the appropriate level of prominence?

3. Imagine everyone looking at your website reads every line of HTML top to bottom. You’re not allowed to use classes or IDs. Do your readers know what, say, the title of your blog article is? Do they know where the navigation is?

4. Do you have multiple page “types” (e.g., blog post, blog index, about me, home page)? Do this for all of those types. Don’t forget to keep making your HTML semantic. Copy and paste similar bits (navigation, etc.) from pages you’ve already created. Yes, if you make changes to one, you will have to change both.

5. Once you’ve done all of these, put a <style> tag linking to a single vanilla CSS file in the header of your simplest page. Start adding styles, beginning with text styling. Can you still tell that links are links? Is it still easy to find the navigation? Do headers look like headers? Good.

6. Did you have to pollute your HTML with a lot of classes to accomplish what you wanted to accomplish, design-wise? This might be OK, but you probably added too many. Can you accomplish the same thing using semantic elements instead? Do so.

7. Copy that <style> tag to the other pages. Do they look pretty decent? They should. Add whatever additional styles those pages NEED.

8. Yes, it does suck having to copy and paste all these repeated blocks all over the place. Find a static site generator or use something like CodeKit[1] so you can use simple includes rather than configuring the mess that is most static site generators. I use a static site generator for my site[2] for fun but don't really need one.

Have fun.

1. https://codekitapp.com 2. https://ft.io


I can think of two approaches:

1. Get a better idea of the tools already at your disposal (HTML5, CSS3). I can recommend Dive into HTML5 http://diveinto.html5doctor.com

2. Start building. Literally, start with the barebones Hello World given in the article. Then gradually turn it into your site, making liberal use of Stack Overflow (direct search) and Google.


Thanks for the link. This whole thread is refreshing. I am someone who does not do web development for a living but occasionally builds a website. Every time I start building a new site I am at a complete loss where to start. Yet I have been doing HTML and CSS since 1999. I am going back to basics, starting with your link.


Open web inspector when you develop a website. You can get a better feel for how changing CSS on the fly take place on the actual webpage.

I would save a copy of the HTML from the top level comment of this thread and use it as a base to start any new project.

I like to start from scratch and add Bootstrap should I need responsiveness once I get to that point. L


Thanks for the tips.


Thank you for the extra sources.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: