> difficult-to-understand and difficult-to-believe doctrines tend to have a unifying force for religious communities because

I would also venture that this leads to many members having different interpretations and assuming everyone shares their own. Of the Wittgenstein ilk.

But, this theory may conflict with your Edit addendum.

> I dislike the term "vibe coding". It means nothing and it's vague.

It has a clear and specific definition. People just misuse and abuse the term.

Karpathy coined it to describe when you put a prompt into an LLM and then either run it or continue to develop on top of it without ever reviewing the output code.

I am unable to tell from TFA if the author has any knowledge or skills in programming and looked at the code or if they did in fact "vibe code".

What is weird about it?

That shorting is terrible: there is literally no limit to what you can lose and so investors are absolutely famous for losing literally everything with often very few short positions.

So shorting should come with a lot of warnings.

> The Bible ... it's probably the most consequential piece of literature ever written.

Even if you really dial in your definition of "consequential", ie. the amount of stagnated technological and societal progress and murder as a result of the Bible's adherents' efforts, this seems an absurd claim.

Most consequential piece of literature is likely the Plimpton 322 or Euclid's Elements or The Epic Of Gilgamesh. The Bible is an embarrassing footnote.