Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hsuduebc2's commentslogin

"National security" is becoming absolutely ridiculous statement over last years.

It was never coherent.

So this specific person singlehandedly doubles the price of oil in a span of one week with his absolutly unnecessary reckless action but for some reason environmental regulations are the problem.

Seems about right.


What wording would you use then if the definition fit? You can use minor addiction or severe addiction but it's still an one.

I strongly doubt that "negligent" is the proper word for "carefully designed to induce as much addictive behavior".

I absolutely don't understand how anyone can support this in the context of rising authoritarianism. Even people in my country which are talking about this phenomena support it. I strongly suspect that they do absolutely know shit about why it's problematic.

I wonder if they would support that every of paper mail would be opened and checked. I strongly doubt that.


It’s a symptom of authoritarianism rising. It wouldn’t be rising if there wasn’t anyone who supports things like that.

That I would understand, but these policies are supported by most liberal politics from my country and opposed by some populists or "strong hand" politicians. I somehow understand that various russian agents are against that, because that can theoretically be used against them but these liberal democrats are somewhat mystery for me.

Because social cohesion is also breaking down (which is also by design). People increasingly do not trust and can not rely on neighbors and their fellow citizens to share similar interests and look out for one another. And they have much less power to organize with other citizens to petition their government.

So they feel they must turn to the state for protection.


Because they fall for the "Its for protecting the Children" Bullshit

An encrypted message has never sexually violated and traumatized a child, but I'd bet good money that many politicians have. So, it's quite apparent what we need to protect children from in my opinion.

Are you suggesting something about powerful pedophiles fucking kids in Caribbean and being carried there through Lolita express? That sounds like a conspiracy right? Right?

Nice website! Sadly, url stays the same across all coutries. I can't send anyone direct link.

>AI helps you with this, because it – increasingly instantly and well – turns English into running code. You can then react to it – "move the button there; make it bluer" – to get incrementally more precise about what you want.

I wonder if author left this as some kind of Easter egg or it's just another life is a simulation moment. In this paragraph he used semicolon and parentheses multiple times. After that only once.

Anyway love the article. It's nice to hear from time to time that one is not becoming obsolete that quick.


Absolutely. Fuck them.

I am curious whether they will "suddenly realized" this after the community feedback process they initiated because they supposedly care so much about their users. Then, out of nowhere, they discovered that users do not want to be spied on or treated as the product. They just want to use their fucking operating system in peace without Microsoft constantly forcing its own products on them.

I wonder when that realization came and why. Maybe they started losing market share to Apple or users just prefer phones to pc even more?


I don't want to be just purely negative but I refuse to believe the sentiment of this post. For years they have been told that windows have pretty shit annoying features which they keep implementing and only thing they did was implement more absolutely useless chatbots all over the place. I do not belive that this is genuine effort to making a better product or answer to ongoing massive enshittifaction of microsoft products to squeeze more money. Maybe people started to leave them for Apple and they noticed?

>Alternatively, there is a killer interview question, as reported by The Register previously: ask them something like "How fat is Kim Jong Un?" and if they are a North Korean, they will terminate the call instantly.

I wonder if they know that he is fat and are afraid to tell, or that it is strictly forbidden to answer these types of questions. I don't really believe this "hack" can work long term.


I’ve had the call terminate with such candidates after frankly stating that they are from North Korea and lying about everything. The person in front of the camera would try to maneuver out of it and then the call ended as if someone pulled the plug behind the scenes. I’ve built some pretty decent heuristics to identify them before wasting time on interviews.


It's that common to encounter them? How do you recognize this scam? The deepfakes are not good enough, or by something like accent?


Never had a deepfake.

I am recruiting in Poland, they say that they're Polish, have very Polish names, but they are clearly not Polish and not in Poland.

It's easy enough to spot their resume's if you know what you're looking for. If you're interested, I can share, but email me (email is in my HN profile).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: