Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fffox's commentslogin

isn't it amazing that 350 people died and years later no one has been put in prison yet?


They did prosecute someone, which looked to me like a case of throwing an underling out of the bus, but it looks like that person was acquitted by a jury:

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/boeing-test-pilot-...

Former Boeing test pilot found not guilty of deceiving FAA

A jury in Texas has found a former Boeing test pilot not guilty of deceiving federal regulators about a key flight-control system on the Boeing 737 Max jetliner

(March 2022)


exactly, that guy was just a fall guy. If a system / organization is designed such that the fate of something as critical as an aircraft depends on ONE test pilot, that system needs to be re-assessed. All those managers / senior engineers / decision makers should be fired / fined and the worst of them should be put in prison.


He was in charge of the testing program at some level. He wasn't purely a pilot.


Don't you have to break the law to go to prison? Or are we trying to recreate the old comintern and frame fallguys in order to make us feel justice was served when sad things happen.



It's infuriating


Most people seem to be giving him the benefit of the doubt that he has cold feet. Personally, I think this was sabotage, he had no intention of buying Twitter in the first place and this was just a ploy to fuck with Twitter.


Doesn't really add up, because he's going to be forced to go through with the deal anyway. I haven't heard a single lawyer with relevant expertise suggest otherwise.

Since that's where we're going to end up, it would be much simpler for him to just cleanly buy Twitter, for whatever purpose he intends.


actually, at first he said he didn't care about the bots and was buying to FIX the bots issue: https://techcrunch.com/2022/04/14/elon-musk-buying-twitter-t...

then all of a sudden he cared, after he had signed.


Yes it's all a conspiracy and he's playing 5 dimensional chess.


Here's Intel's most recent 10K: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0000050863/0...

Should a company whose revenue is $79 billion a year with a *current* asset of $57 billion be able to get taxpayer's handout?


Who else can afford the lobbying required to make it happen?


meanwhile, Intel CEO is paid handsomely for a languishing company, even more than Apple's Tim Cook.

https://www.reuters.com/business/intel-ceo-earned-1711-times...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: