It's a varied area of research, we do plenty of things. Training things on a simulator, and then using that to transfer domain to the real world is a fairly typical application.

The platform is supposed to provide him value, it should not be the other way around. Is it wrong for an individual like Elton John to choose to distance himself from a platform that allows, in his view, things that are harmful?

If the platform makes him feel uneasy, he is well within his rights to simply leave it. Leaving the platform is the way he exercises his own freedom of speech.

"Will this community provide me value?" is the question I seek for any social network I consider getting into. It's the reason I stopped using Facebook. Too many angry people posting things I didn't like.

I have never asked for their censorship. Let them continue talking, I simply do not want to listen. I have that right.

I'm not sure this is a good idea, but I'm curious to see how it'll be implemented. Up until now, Twitter's differentiating factor has been the amount of information conveyed by Tweets, with as few words as possible. This is how information quickly travels from person to person.

I wonder how that will change the dynamics of the website.