Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Raed667's commentslogin

He can get a smartphone dedicated to the ticket app if it is such a huge piece of his life/hobby

"Cheap android phone" on Google Shopping shows options for $30. Didn't even know they get that cheap.

Is then logging into your Google account (if you have one) also without cost and tradeoffs?

Just create a new one… you people are just looking for ways to be difficult about this

Have you tried creating a Google account without a mobile phone number from a public computer? Go ahead, I’ll wait.

Ok, so assuming he doesn’t want to spend $500+ for a mobile phone, he’s looking at an Android. Then, when he logs into a Google account, Google hoovers up his location, his associated credit card (if he has one, what if he does not and does not want one?), and countless other personal metadata at the very least that will likely never go away. Even if he does suddenly go from no smartphone to being a savvy personal steward of his digital privacy, you can bet that Google is scrambling to capture as much as possible, at all times, about its users’ personal lives and data.

  - If he doesn’t want a Google account, /just/ create a new one
  - If he doesn’t have a credit card, /just/ use a family member’s
  - If he has Parkinson’s and can’t use touch input, /just/ have a friend do it
  - etc.
The question is not whether these obstacles can be overcome (trivially, by “normals”). The question is whether we want these to be the default requirements for basic participation in society. And it’s a completely legitimate question.

Will the app work on it?

Also will you need a $xx/month cell phone subscription plan? With a credit check and everything?


What if he doesn't agree to google/apple's terms of service?

Then he can't buy the tickets. People aren't born with a god-given right to get seasons tickets to Dodger's games. There are businesses that choose not to handle cash and only accept credit or debit payments. I need to agree to a credit card companies terms and conditions for that too. Is that unreasonable?

what about the payment method?

they seem to be calling `chrome-extension://.....` so i don't think it applies to firefox

you're assuming zuck or jobs kids have anything resembling "normal" children lives

The key message that poster before tried to convey was that they themselves do not believe into their own products, not that rich kids are privileged royal kings today. This ties into e. g. Facebook trying to addict people into using it - infinite scrolling as an example. The latter can be quite a problem on youtube or people using smartphones while riding in a subway, jumping from pointless video to pointless video - this is quite addictive.

a blanket "entertainment only" disclaimer likely wouldn't survive scrutiny for a product actively/relentlessly marketed as a productivity tool

depends how much judges are interested in bling.

not all commutes look the same, I take the bus, the train and bike as much as possible.

for example this saturday when i wasn't in a hurry and went from Antibes to Nice.

I took a bus(1€), then train (6.8€) then metro(1.7€) for a total of 1 hour 15 minutes and 9.5€ (multiply by 2 for the round trip) it would have been a 20 minute motorcycle ride.


I put Google Sheets as a backend (in production) when i wanted a select non technical people to be able to see and modify the data without the cost of building a backend.

I really wish auth was easier to setup for services though, i see no reason google can't provide this out of the box


You can auth with Google auth after you configure an app, what are you thinking of that would be simpler?

I meant to authenticate a service (that is not running on GCP) to access the sheet, it requires a service account and felt more convoluted than what it needs to be

Completely agree. Managing service account JSON keys and configuring IAM roles just to access a single sheet feels like a huge overhead for simple projects.

As someone who really doesn't care about learning the details, and just want one USB-C cable that does it ALL to put in my backpack what should I buy ?

You don’t really want that. A thunderbolt cable is both stiff and expensive. They only really make sense to leave attached to the back of a monitor or dock.

What would work better is a flexible 100w+ usb3 cable. You can’t do thunderbolt on it but it’s a tiny fraction of the cost and does everything you’d actually need on the go.

If you actually do want it, this is the do everything cable https://www.apple.com/au/xc/product/MW5H3ZA/A


So much this. I have a few different categories of "known good" USB-C cables because one type doesn't fit all my use cases. Sometimes the trait I need is >100w PD charging at 1M. Sometimes I need 80 Gbps dual 4k video at 3M. Other times I need 40 Gbps .5M to a portable NVMe enclosure. USB-C cables I regularly rely on range from $5 to $100 and weight/size varies >3x.

And in my tiny 'go bike bag' for day trips I need one 2M cable that's thin, coils into a tight ball and weighs nothing yet will charge up to 45w and reliably xfer data at up to 5Gbps (USB 3.1) for quick uploads with optional USB-A and Micro-USB adapters at either end (because I still know people with Micro-USB (though it obviously drops to USB2 speeds)).


At my workplace someone always orders the what they perceive to be the "best" cables. They aren't thunderbolt, they are just oversized with thick braiding. They are all so stiff and heavy you can barely handle a phone while charging without the cable pulling itself out.

I’m sure it’s overkill but I wanted to know how much power my laptop or whatever was actually drawing.

https://iaohi.com/products/aohi-the-future-adonis-usb4-2-0-2...


Love this! I got a USB C multimeter and used it to test the output of two dozen chargers. Wanted to see if they supplied the voltage that was advertised. Funny enough, AOHI was the only brand whose chargers actually increased their voltage as my current draw went up. It was like the engineers knew about the resistance in the wire and decided to compensate by upping the voltage slightly.

As an alternative, you could get a stand-alone USB-C power meter which can be used with any cable. That way, when the cable breaks, you don't have to buy a new power meter. Here is an example of one such product (though I've never used this model): https://www.amazon.com/Adapter-Voltage-Current-Extension-Con...

LTT did a lot of work to prove their cables do everything they say:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47561827

(these are what I would buy from a sea of cables, not the cheapest, but far from the most expensive)


A thunderbolt cable

This is the solution, but it is 1) expensive and 2) Thunderbolt cables are quite short compared to regular USB-C.

Apple sells a 3m one, It’s just $250AUD.

I imagine at that length and speed, signal integrity becomes difficult.


Well they do want it all so they can pay for all, right? :)

And to be precise, a nice, high quality thunderbolt cable from a reputable manufacturer like Apple or OWC. Protect the cable as it will have been expensive, but it will work very well.

Would it work with USB-C screens and projectors ?

> set up catch-all addresses but also send emails from any email address I wanted

I have been frustrated with ProtonMail for this exact reason, i have a catch all but responding is a hassle where i have to manually create an address.

I wish Proton would just allow me to respond to an email from the address it was addressed to


My prediction for 2023 is 2 out 3 (so far)

> Despite the initial hype, Rome tools, Deno & Bun will be quasi abandoned as the ecosystem outpaces their release cycle and the benefits don’t merit the headache of migration.

https://blog.raed.dev/posts/predictions_2023


I defaulted to Biome for all greenfield projects a year ago, and at this point you would have to drag me kicking and screaming back to ESLint and Prettier. I also defaulted to Bun and still think Bun is leagues better than Node.js but I now have my doubts about its future after seeing the OpenCode devs consciously minimize their dependency on Bun for strategic reasons.


Rome tools is now Biome and Biome is really good. The company didn't work out but the tool itself is better than ever.


I think you are 0/3.

- Bun just got acquired by Anthropic, which has seemingly accelerated development. Last release: 4 days ago.

- Deno is still kicking as a company, this blog post notwithstanding. Last release: 3 days ago.

- Rome was forked into Biome. Biome last release: 4 days ago.


Deno hasn't been abandoned though. The company still survives. These layoffs are probably to focus resources on the runtime and subhosting product.

Bun is in much better shape than it was in 2023 and its future is less uncertain today than it was back then.


They just wanted a platform they control instead of apple or Google


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: