Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | GaryBluto's commentslogin

> Though I find it odd HOW popular it is now days.

I once saw somebody say it's a way to make relatively mundane vanilla porn while also getting views from people into the taboo factor.


I've been using Opus 4.6 to make myself a harness for old Macs that uses models offered by the Github Copilot subscription.

From my experience, when it creates working Objective-C, it's great. When it slips up, it slips up majorly.


https://youtu.be/ntICHMV-WMA?t=40

"Google Shuts Down Gmail For Two Hours To Show Its Immense Power"


It used to be excellent but is now just Chrome à la Chinese consortium.

can you ellaborate on "Chrome à la Chinese consortium"?

If the DoW/DoD wants Anthropic, they'll get Anthropic, whether we know about it publicly or not. It's not unlikely that they're already working together and just putting on a show for the public.

I'd even go as far to say that if this is indeed a publicity campaign it is the most successful one I've seen in years. Many detractors of the existence of LLMs are suddenly leaping to Anthropic's defence.


This is the only careful comment. Everything else here is trying to mentally push away the inevitable. You can argue if it is noble to perform resistance in the face of what is pretty much fate, but I would not put any cent on that.

GP was referring to Google's search AI not ChatGPT Health.

You say "uncompromising stance" with "justification", I say stubborn prejudice. They simply state the same weak, nonsensical complaints that apply to many other technologies that they undoubtedly don't have issues with and are happy with the use of.

Slavery wasn't inefficient and was highly profitable for slaveholders.

Not contradicting the second part, but I want to emphasise that they are different things. Slavery (and capitalism) can be extremely inefficient and simultaneously wildly profitable.

Surely it's meaningless to compare the efficiency of slavery vs other systems, since your set of resources is completely different.

You could if you look at e.g. the crop yield (ceteris paribus). I don't know why you would, because what sane conclusion could you draw from it?

You could compare systems to identify which one produces the greatest profit from the least costs, which the main thing an entrepreneur cares about.

Not as profitable for robot owners today

Except the slaveholders entire life revolved around managing slaves and worrying about slave revolts.

No. If you actually read the history, many slaveholder delegates management works to slaves

So not much has changed really?

Yep pretty much no difference between 1800s chattle slavery, and having to work in an office.

> Back during the Iraq war days and government overreach into privacy violations, the tech companies were on the side of the American people. They fought to defend the 4th amendment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM

PRISM started in 2007, during the Iraq war.


PRISM always seemed to me like an extension of ECHELON from the 1960s. Governments have been doing sigint for a very long time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON


I thought there would be one or two results, perhaps a result of poor reoccurring phrasing. Nope.

>i'm going to change your diaper and burp you

>Carlito is a very good boy Go piss in your diaper you big baby

>He doesn't care. He is a big baby who filled up his diaper with pee pee and poo poo

>you are a big baby and i am going to change your diaper and burp you <

>To be clear I call executives of multi trillion dollar companies scumbags and if you can't deal with that I'm not sure what to do. Burp you? Change your diaper?

>I am going to change your diaper and burp you

>Yeah man it's real authoritarian to say your second name is doodoo. Go change your diaper you big baby

>Yeah because you're a big baby with a big full diaper

>Hello sir this is your uber outside. I have your order from the diaper store


Yeah it’s become a mini-meme amongst the AI folk on Bluesky [0]

[0]: https://bsky.app/profile/dame.is/post/3ltnty3gebs22


Is that a fetish, or just idiosyncratic and more aggressive way of mocking someone for being weak/immature/"being a baby"?

Those quotes that I could interpret read more as contempt to me than some kind of role play.


>Is that a fetish...

Th answer is always yes.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: