That's cool but try jumping in to Pavlov or VRChat on a Friday night and then tell me there isn't a thriving community. It's not mainstream but it definitely isn't dead.
You're trying to compare Apples to Oranges here, VR is still pretty early on in its development. Like Motorola DynaTAC[0] early. The iPhone of VR is probably still 2 decades out. We're still figuring out our UI metaphors and trying to reach a critical mass of competent users where it's possible to just "call" someone up in VR without first asking if they have a headset, asking if they know how X app works, figure out where to meet etc. It's like trying to get someone to email you in the early 90s.
Trying to compare this nascent technology to the iPhone is really disingenuous, there are probably a billion iPhone users worldwide. I'd struggle to count on one hand branded devices that have the same number of users.
> A great example on why 'trust' only works for everything inside the Blockchain only.
Having a “trustless” component at the core of a Blockchain has made us all re-examine the places where we deeply rely on trust for real interaction. It is ironic how “trustless” technology is so apt for scamming if you can trigger peoples desire for wealth at the same time. “You don’t have to trust me” was always a great bait for a victim who takes trust for granted. You just need to say high numbers and people will wire money to you.
Not that I’m terribly experienced with it, but a lot of home automation can be done without “IoT” — specifically without the crapware Trojan controllers that come with consumer solutions from Best Buy. ISY994 for example. Easy solutions for remote access via apps (vpn to home) and notifications as well. It’s not as easy to set up as a plug and play controller from Google, but it’s far more private.
Your comment reads as an excuse in why it's okay that we are that slow.