>it may take a lot of computational mass to simulate a person
I don't understand much of what's going on here, but couldn't it possibly take virtually no computational mass in order to simulate a person? I mean, if you tie the whole system together such that if you simply switch the smallest of switches from 0 to 1 that sends out desired changes rippling out through the rest of the system, it wouldn't matter how much mass it took.
Why does it have to take a lot of mass to simulate a person - does what's outside necessarily have to be more complex than what's on the inside?
I don't understand much of what's going on here, but couldn't it possibly take virtually no computational mass in order to simulate a person? I mean, if you tie the whole system together such that if you simply switch the smallest of switches from 0 to 1 that sends out desired changes rippling out through the rest of the system, it wouldn't matter how much mass it took.
Why does it have to take a lot of mass to simulate a person - does what's outside necessarily have to be more complex than what's on the inside?